When content is added to make a story more interesting to someone’s way of thinking, it can eventually cast doubt upon the factual origin of the story. Ancient myths probably began that way. Where there is substantial agreement between ancient writings, there is likely some basis in reality, but the tendency is to dismiss it all because of elements of fantasy.
Some teach that sections of the Bible are mythological because of content similar to myths and legends. It makes better sense to believe the myths arose from misguided attempts to communicate history. Ancient writings, including myths, that contain information similar to the Bible can be viewed as historical evidence.
Myths and beliefs influenced the records of ancient historians, and that is evident in their writings, yet much of the content is as accurate as they could make it. The same process takes place today as evolutionary beliefs permeate the work of science. The scientific data may be sound while the interpretations of it are totally wrong.
The Jewish historian Josephus (37 A.D. – 100 ? A.D.), names some writers and historians of other nations who mention the long life span of early man. He cites the writings of Manetho, Berosus, Mochus, Hestiaeus, Hieronymus, Hesiod, Hecataeus, Hellanicus, Acusilaus, Ephorus, and Nicolaus, as evidence that the ages given in Genesis are a true account.
Josephus also writes that ancient knowledge of an astronomical event that he calls, “the Great Year” (Antiquities of the Jews, 1.3.9), is evidence of the long life of early man. In that instance, I haven’t been able to determine what Josephus was speaking of. The Kreutz Sungrazer Comets have an orbit of about that length of time, and are thought to be fragments of a much larger comet, but would the reappearance of a comet be termed “the Great Year?”
Was Josephus wrong about some astronomical event taking place in a 600 year interval? Would man have to have lived more than 600 years to have discovered it? Just about any information can be interpreted in multiple ways. That is an area where atheists and evolutionists are very deceptive. Many of them know that the Creationist’s interpretation is at least as good as their own, but they’re keeping it secret. They seem to feel that censorship of Creationism is justifiable because of their own personal beliefs.
The apostle Paul, writing his first letter to Timothy (verse 1:4), advises caution regarding “myths (or fables) and endless genealogies, which provoke questions…” Paul gave similar advise in his letter to Titus in verse 3:9. You can get dragged into endless arguments about details of any sort, to the point that you lose your focus. Many of the details however, if viewed in correct context, bring the big picture into better focus.
A huge book could be written showing how the Myths offer collaborating evidence for the truth of the Bible. They testify of a creation by God, the fall of man, the long life span of early man, and many other things which I intend to list later.
The genealogical, and chronological information in the Bible is there for a reason. On the surface, it may not be the most interesting reading, but dig down through it like an archeologist and you never know what you might find. If anyone wants to unearth the truth, the Bible is the place to dig.